Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Symmetries and conservation laws

Consider a Lagrangian L(qI,q˙I)L(q^I, \dot{q}^I). A symmetry is a transformation

qI→(qI)′(qI)q^I \to (q^I)'(q^I)

such that

L(qI,q˙I)=L((qI)′,(q˙I)′)+dΛ(q,q˙)dtL(q^I, \dot{q}^I) = L((q^I)', (\dot{q}^I)') + \frac{d\Lambda(q,\dot q)}{dt}

where (q˙I)′=ddt(qI)′(\dot{q}^I)' = \frac{d}{dt} (q^I)'. The last term in (1) is a total derivative; thus (as one can see by studying the resulting action) it does not contribute to the equations of motion.

In other words, the action is invariant under symmetries up to a boundary term.

Example: cyclic coordinates

The simplest example is a Lagrangian which is independent of some subset of the coordinates, while it depends on all components of the velocity. Specifically, let L(qI,q˙I)L(q^I, \dot{q}^I) be independent of qkq^k for some kk (but let LL still depends on q˙k\dot{q}^k). Under the transformation qk→(qk)′=qk+αq^k \to (q^k)' = q^k + \alpha for α\alpha a constant real number, q˙k\dot{q}^k is invariant, and thus the entire Lagrangian is. We call qkq^k a cyclic coordinate.

What does this mean for the equations of motion? Well, we know that

Fk=∂L∂qk=0{\cal F}_k = \frac{\del L}{\del q^k} = 0

The Euler-Lagrange equations for qkq^k become:

p˙k=∂L∂q˙k=0\dot{p}^k = \frac{\del L}{\del \dot{q}^k} = 0

In other words, the generalized momentum pkp^k is conserved.

Some examples:

  1. Consider L=12m(x˙2+y˙2+z˙2)−V(x,y)L = \half m(\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2 + \dot{z}^2) - V(x,y). Then zz is a cyclic coordinate, and the momentum pz=mz˙p_z = m \dot{z} is conserved, as a result of invariance of the action under translations in the zz direction.

  2. A particle in polar coordinates in a central force, L=12m(r˙2+r2ϕ˙2)−V(r)L = \half m (\dot{r}^2 + r^2 \dot{\phi}^2) - V(r). We studied this last time; the cyclic coordinate is ϕ\phi and the conserved conjugate momentum os pϕ=mr2ϕ˙p_{\phi} = m r^2 \dot{\phi} which is the angular momentum. Thus, invariance under rotations implies the conservation of angular momentum.

These suggest a more general story to which we now turn.

Noether’s theorem

Noether’s theorem applies to continuous symmetries, that is, to a continuous family of transformations (qI)′=(qI)′(qI ;α)(q^I)' = (q^I)'(q^I\ ; \alpha) where α\alpha is some real parameter and (qI)′(qI ;0)=qI(q^I)'(q^I\ ; 0) = q^I. Noether showed that every such family of symmetries implied a conservation law.

We will provide a constuctive proof. Let (qI)′=qI+δqI(q^I)' = q^I + \delta q^I. If this transformation is a symmetry, then

L(qI,+δqI,q˙I+δq˙I)=L(qIq˙I)+dΛdt=L(qI,q˙I)+δqI∂L∂qI+δq˙I∂L∂q˙I+O(δq2)\begin{align} L(q^I, + \delta q^I, \dot{q}^I + \delta \dot{q}^I) & = L(q^I \dot{q}^I) + \frac{d\Lambda}{dt} \\ = L(q^I, \dot{q}^I) + \delta q^I \frac{\del L}{\del q^I} + \delta \dot{q}^I \frac{\del L}{\del \dot{q}^I} + {\cal O}(\delta q^2) \end{align}

Working to first order in δq\delta q, the fact that this is a symmetry means that

δqI∂L∂qI+δq˙I∂L∂q˙I=dΛdt=δqI∂L∂qI+ddt(δqI∂L∂q˙I)−δqIddt∂L∂q˙I\begin{align} \delta q^I \frac{\del L}{\del q^I} + \delta \dot{q}^I \frac{\del L}{\del \dot{q}^I} & = \frac{d\Lambda}{dt}\\ & = \delta q^I \frac{\del L}{\del q^I} + \frac{d}{dt} \left(\delta q^I \frac{\del L}{\del \dot{q}^I}\right) - \delta q^I \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\del L}{\del \dot{q}^I} \end{align}

Now the first and last terms on the second line are just δqI\delta q^I times the Euler-Lagrange equations, and so vanish if qI(t)q^I(t) satisfies the classical equations of motion. When it does, we are left with

ddt(δqI∂L∂q˙I−Λ)=ddt(δqIpI−Λ)=0\frac{d}{dt} \left(\delta q^I \frac{\del L}{\del \dot{q}^I} - \Lambda\right) = \frac{d}{dt} \left(\delta q^I p_I - \Lambda\right) = 0

Thus we have a conserved charge, sometimes called a Noether charge,

Q=δqIpI−ΛQ = \delta q^I p_I - \Lambda

for every infinitesimal symmetry transformation q→q+δqq \to q + \delta q.

Examples.

  1. We have given two classic examples in the discussion above, of linear and angular momentum, and I invite the student to show that the charges QQ associated to translational and rotational invariance lead to the same conserved quantities.

  2. Similarly, one can work in Cartesian coordinates with the infinitesimal rotation x→cos⁡ϵx−sin⁡ϵyx \to \cos\epsilon x - \sin \epsilon y and y→cos⁡ϵy+sin⁡ϵxy \to \cos \epsilon y + \sin \epsilon x. For infinitesimal ϵ\epsilon, δx=−ϵy\delta x = - \epsilon y and δy=ϵx\delta y = \epsilon x. For the Lagrangian L=12m(x˙2+y˙2)=V(x2+y2)L = \half m (\dot{x}^2 + \dot{y}^2) = V(\sqrt{x^2 + y^2}), which is clearly invariant under rotations, the associated Noether charge is

Q=δxpx+δypy=−ypx+xpy=LQ = \delta x p_x + \delta y p_y = - y p_x + x p_y = L

where LL is the angular momentum in Cartesian coordinates. I leave it to the student to show that this is the same as the generalized momentum pϕp_{\phi} dreived in polar coordinates.

  1. Another important symmetry is time translation invariance; the symmetry is a shift t→t+ϵt \to t + \eps. Consider a Lagrangian which is explicitly time-independent. Then

L(q(t+ϵ),q˙(t+ϵ))=L(q+ϵq˙,q˙+ϵq¨)=L(q,q˙)+ϵ[q˙I∂L∂qI+q¨I∂L∂q˙I]=L+ϵddtL(q,q˙)\begin{align} L(q(t + \eps), \dot{q}(t + \eps)) & = L(q + \eps \dot{q}, \dot{q} + \eps \ddot{q}) \\ & = L(q,\dot{q}) + \eps \left[\dot{q}^I \frac{\del L}{\del q^I} + \ddot{q}^I \frac{\del L}{\del \dot{q}^I}\right]\\ & = L + \eps \frac{d}{dt} L(q,\dot{q}) \end{align}

The conserved quantity is thus

Q=ϵ(q˙IpI−L)Q = \eps (\dot{q}^I p_I - L)

The quantity H=q˙IpI−LH = \dot{q}^I p_I - L is known as the Hamiltonian and the energy is defined as the value of the Hamiltonian: that is, energy is the quantity which is conserved as a result of time translation invariance.

As an example, consider L=12mx⃗˙2−V(x⃗)=T−VL = \half m \dot{\vec{x}}^2 - V({\vec x}) = T - V; here T=12mx⃗˙2T = \half m \dot{\vec{x}}^2 is the kinetic energy and VV is the potential energy. The Hamiltonian is

H=x⃗˙⋅p⃗−12mx⃗˙2+V(x⃗)=12mp⃗2+V=T+V\begin{align} H & = \dot{\vec x} \cdot \vec{p} - \half m \dot{\vec{x}}^2 + V({\vec x})\\ & = \frac{1}{2m}{\vec p}^2 + V = T + V \end{align}

where in the final line we used p⃗=mx⃗˙\vec{p} = m\dot{\vec{x}}. In this case HH is simply the kinetic plus potential energy.