where (q˙I)′=dtd(qI)′. The last term in (1) is a total derivative; thus (as one can see by studying the resulting action) it does not contribute to the equations of motion.
In other words, the action is invariant under symmetries up to a boundary term.
The simplest example is a Lagrangian which is independent of some subset of the coordinates, while it depends on all components of the velocity. Specifically, let L(qI,q˙I) be independent of qk for some k (but let Lstill depends onq˙k). Under the transformation qk→(qk)′=qk+α for α a constant real number, q˙k is invariant, and thus the entire Lagrangian is. We call qk a cyclic coordinate.
What does this mean for the equations of motion? Well, we know that
In other words, the generalized momentum pk is conserved.
Some examples:
Consider L=21m(x˙2+y˙2+z˙2)−V(x,y). Then z is a cyclic coordinate, and the momentum pz=mz˙ is conserved, as a result of invariance of the action under translations in the z direction.
A particle in polar coordinates in a central force, L=21m(r˙2+r2ϕ˙2)−V(r). We studied this last time; the cyclic coordinate is ϕ and the conserved conjugate momentum os pϕ=mr2ϕ˙ which is the angular momentum. Thus, invariance under rotations implies the conservation of angular momentum.
These suggest a more general story to which we now turn.
Noether’s theorem applies to continuous symmetries, that is, to a continuous family of transformations (qI)′=(qI)′(qI;α) where α is some real parameter and (qI)′(qI;0)=qI. Noether showed that every such family of symmetries implied a conservation law.
We will provide a constuctive proof. Let (qI)′=qI+δqI. If this transformation is a symmetry, then
Now the first and last terms on the second line are just δqI times the Euler-Lagrange equations, and so vanish if qI(t) satisfies the classical equations of motion. When it does, we are left with
We have given two classic examples in the discussion above, of linear and angular momentum, and I invite the student to show that the charges Q associated to translational and rotational invariance lead to the same conserved quantities.
Similarly, one can work in Cartesian coordinates with the infinitesimal rotation
x→cosϵx−sinϵy and y→cosϵy+sinϵx. For infinitesimal ϵ, δx=−ϵy and δy=ϵx. For the Lagrangian L=21m(x˙2+y˙2)=V(x2+y2), which is clearly invariant under rotations, the associated Noether charge is
where L is the angular momentum in Cartesian coordinates. I leave it to the student to show that this is the same as the generalized momentum pϕ dreived in polar coordinates.
Another important symmetry is time translation invariance; the symmetry is a shift t→t+ϵ. Consider a Lagrangian which is explicitly time-independent. Then
The quantity H=q˙IpI−L is known as the Hamiltonian and the energy is defined as the value of the Hamiltonian: that is, energy is the quantity which is conserved as a result of time translation invariance.
As an example, consider L=21mx˙2−V(x)=T−V; here T=21mx˙2 is the kinetic energy and V is the potential energy. The Hamiltonian is