Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

TDPT systematics: the Dyson series

Let us focus on the TDSE in the interaction picture. You can convince yourself that if VS(t)V_S(t) is a Hermitian operator, so is VI(t)V_I(t). Now the TDSE in the interaction picture

itψ(t)I=ϵVI(t)ψ(t)Ii\hbar \partial_t\ket{\psi(t)}_I = \eps V_I(t) \ket{\psi(t)}_I

is formally the same as the full TDSE with ψ(t)Sψ(t)I\ket{\psi(t)}_S \to \ket{\psi(t)}_I, HVIH \to V_I. Thus ψ(t)I\ket{\psi(t)}_I also undergoes unitary time evolution with U_I(t,t_0) = e^{i H_0 t/\hbar} U_S(t,0).Wecanconstructitdirectlyfromthis,orbywriting. We can construct it directly from this, or by writing \ket{\psi(t)}_I = U_I(t,0) \ket{\psi(0)}$ and inserting this into (1) to find:

itUI(t,0)=ϵVI(t)UI(t,0)i\hbar \del_t U_I(t,0) = \eps V_I(t) U_I(t,0)

We can solve this formally by noting that UI(0,0)=1U_I(0,0) = {\bf 1}:

UI(t)=1i0tdtϵVI(t)UI(t)U_I(t) = {\bf 1} - \frac{i}{\hbar}\int_0^t dt' \eps V_I(t') U_I(t')

where I have suppressed the dependence on the initial time. This may not seem useful, but since we are eventuall looking for a power series in ϵ\eps we can solve this equation recursively. That is, plug the LHS of (3) into the RHS, so that

UI(t)=1iϵ0tdtVI(t)+(iϵ)20tdt0tdtVI(t)VI(t)UI(t)+U_I(t) = {\bf 1} - \frac{i\eps}{\hbar} \int_0^t dt' V_I(t') + \left(\frac{-i \eps}{\hbar}\right)^2 \int_0^t dt' \int_0^{t'} dt'' V_I(t') V_I(t'') U_I(t'') + \ldots

Clearly we can continue this trend and write the Dyson series

UI(t)=n=0(iϵ)n0tdt10t1dt20tn1dtNVI(t1)VI(t2)VI(tn)U_I(t) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \left(\frac{-i \eps}{\hbar}\right)^n \int_0^t dt_1 \int_0^{t_1} dt_2 \ldots \int_0^{t_{n-1}} dt_N V_I(t_1) V_I(t_2)\ldots V_I(t_n)

Note that the products of VI(t)V_I(t) are arranged in descending order of the time variable in their argument. With some work, one can convince oneself that this can be written as

Unexpected end of input in a macro argument, expected '}' at end of input: …ldots V_I(t_n)]

U_I(t) = \sum_{n = 0}^{\infty} \left(\frac{-i \eps}{\hbar}\right)^n \frac{1]{n!}\int_0^t dt_1 \ldots \int_0^t dt_n T[V_I(t_1) V_I(t_2)\ldots V_I(t_n)]

where TT is the time ordering operator. That is, given a set of times ti=1,,nt_{i = 1,\ldots, n}, and a permutation σSn\sigma \in S_n such that

tσ(1)tσ(2)tσ(n)t_{\sigma(1)} \geq t_{\sigma(2)} \geq \cdots \geq t_{\sigma(n)}

Then

T[VI(t1)VI(tn)]=VI(tσ(1))VI(tσ(2))VI(tσ(n))T[V_I(t_1)\ldots V_I(t_n)] = V_I(t_{\sigma(1)})V_I(t_{\sigma(2)}) \ldots V_I(t_{\sigma(n)})

The integration region is now redundant (because before applying the TT operator it is over all time orderings), which is taken care of by the factor of 1/n!1/n!. We can write this expression more elegantly as

U(t)=T[exp(iϵ0tdtVI(t))]U(t) = T \left[ \exp\left( - \frac{i\eps}{\hbar}\int_0^t dt' V_I(t')\right)\right]