Skip to article frontmatterSkip to article content
Site not loading correctly?

This may be due to an incorrect BASE_URL configuration. See the MyST Documentation for reference.

Transition amplitudes

Solving the TDSE

Consider a Hamiltonian with the following structure

H=H0+ϵV(t)H = H_0 + \eps V(t)

where we know the eigenvectors n\ket{n} of H0H_0 and the associated eigenvalues EnE_n. At any time tt we can expand our state in the basis n\ket{n} which we take to be orthonormal (as such a basis of eigenvectors of the Hermitian operator H0H_0 always exists).:

ψ(t)=ncn(t)n\ket{\psi(t)} = \sum_n c_n(t) \ket{n}

We can then write the time-dependent Schroedinger equation

itψ(t)=(H0+ϵV)ψ(t)i\hbar \del_t \ket{\psi(t)} = (H_0 + \eps V)\ket{\psi(t)}

as

nic˙nn=ncn(t)(En+ϵV)n\sum_n i\hbar{\dot c}_n \ket{n} = \sum_n c_n(t)(E_n + \eps V)\ket{n}

taking the inner product with a specific eigenket n\bra{n} we have

ic˙n=Encn+ϵmnV(t)mcm(t)i\hbar {\dot c}_n = E_n c_n + \eps \sum_m \bra{n} V(t) \ket{m} c_m(t)

which is a coupled set of first order differential equations.

The interaction picture

Now the first time on the right hand side is a nuisance and at any rate does not correspond to a change in teh amplitude of cnc_n. To see this, we redefine

cn(t)=c~n(t)eiEnt/c_n(t) = {\tilde c}_n(t) e^{- i E_n t/\hbar}

Making this substitution, we find that the time derivative acting on cnc_n includes a term that cancels the EncnE_n c_n term. The upshot is:

ic~˙n=mnϵVmei(EnEm)t/c~m(t)=mneiH0t/ϵVeiH0t/mc~mmnϵVI(t)mc~m(t)\begin{align} i\hbar {\dot{\tilde c}}_n & = \sum_m \bra{n} \eps V\ket{m} e^{i (E_n - E_m) t/\hbar} {\tilde c}_m(t)\\ & = \sum_m \bra{n} e^{i H_0 t/\hbar} \eps V e^{-i H_0 t/\hbar} \ket{m} {\tilde c}_m\\ & \equiv \sum_m \bra{n} \eps V_I(t) \ket{m} {\tilde c}_m(t) \end{align}

where we define interaction picture operators as

OI(t)=eiH0t/OS(t)eiH0t/\cO_I(t) = e^{i H_0 t/\hbar} \cO_S(t) e^{-i H_0 t/\hbar}

Here OS(t)\cO_S(t) is a Schrodinger picture operator, which we have allowed to have explicit time-dependence (for example, if we want to subject a charged particle to a time-dependent electromagnetic field). We can also define the state in the interaction picture as

ψ(t)I=eiH0t/ψ(t)=nc~(t)n\ket{\psi(t)}_I = e^{i H_0 t/\hbar} \ket{\psi(t)} = \sum_n {\tilde c}(t)\ket{n}

This is like the Heisenberg picture, but instead of evolving the actual state from tt back to t=0t = 0 with the full Hamiltonian, we do so with the unperturbed Hamiltonian H0H_0. The difference between these two protocols is a measure of the degree of interaction. Indeed, we can see from equation (7) that the Schroedinger equation can be written as

itψ(t)I=ϵVI(t)ψ(t)Ii\hbar \del_t \ket{\psi(t)}_I = \eps V_I(t) \ket{\psi(t)}_I

Since we are interested in transitions (changes of the state) induced by interactions, this formulation isolates the questions at hand.