Before continuing to specific systems, we want to make a couple general comments on dynamics.
Energy-time uncertainty¶
The position-momentum uncertainty principle is often complemented with an energy-time uncertainty principle:
This could be argued for, for example, by noting that the energy is a component of a four-vector for which the spatial momenta are also components, , and similarly for time and space: . But that isn’t the strongest argument, and at any rate we are dealing with non-relativistic theories. For starters, in this case is a parameter not an operator.
Another handwaving argument is that if we measure a system over a finite time , the measurement process itself violates time translation invariance. In quantum mechanics as well as in classical mechanics, the conservation of energy follows from this invariance; thus in a measurement is no longer conserved.
But we can make a more precise statement that gives some definition of . Let be the Hamiltonian and some Hermitian operator. We have already shown that
If we define and
then we get our uncertainty principle. We can ghink of as the time it takes for to change by an amount -- that is, the time scale for a change in the state to be noticeable.
Conservation of probability¶
We have noted before that is a probability density; one integrates it over a region to find the probability that a particle lives in that region.
Now the total probability in a system must be 1. But over time, the probability that a particle is found in a given region can change; however it must change in such a way that the integrated probability does not.
To see how this works, we can use the Schroedinger equation and compute:
Note how the potential has dropped out of this equation. If we define the probability current as:
and the probability density as:
then we get the continuity equation
That is, the change of probability in a region is due to the flux of into and out of that region. This guarantees the conservation of probability in the entire space so long as vanishes quickly enough at infinity.