It is easy to show from this representation that x^,p^ are Hermitian. To see this, recall that the adjoint map takes O∣χ⟩→⟨χ∣O†. We want to show that ⟨χ∣O∣ψ⟩=⟨χ∣O†∣ψ⟩ for all ∣χ⟩,∣ψ⟩. for the position operator, xi∣χ⟩=∣xiχ⟩ and ⟨xiχ∣=⟨χ∣(xi)†. But
where in the second to last line we integrated by parts. Since teh functions must be square integrable, they vanish at infinity, and the bounary term you get from integrating by parts should vanish also.
We have to date discussed quantum mechanics in terms of abstract vector spaces, including the space of functions. In the case of particles moving in space, we have argued that this vector space is the vector space of square-integrable functions. In the case of particles in d dimensions this is L2(Rd), that is, complex functions on Rd which satisfy
In general we expect that we can write the dynamics of the states in terms of the function ψ. First, since any state at any time can be represented by a complex function ψ, we can write it as ∣ψ(x,t)⟩ .For the Hamiltonians such as
This last can be shown via representing the derivative as the limit of a difference between ψ(x,t+ϵ)−ψ(t), and using the linearity of quantum mechanics which means that
Practically speaking, this is the form we work with for particles moving in space -- for the simple harmonic oscillator, or particles in a magnetic field (eg in the quantum hall systems), the hydrogen atom (ignoring spin), and so on. In the end, though, we should remember we are working with a vector space, and that the Schrodinger equation remains a linear equation.