Tihs is exactly solvable in both classical and quantum mechanics. Why do we consider such a potential, besides this nice fact of classical solvablility? Because at low energies, it is often a good first approximation to a given potential.
Since we are looking near a minimum, V′(x0)=0. We can also shift the total energy (since it is irrelevant in classical and qauntum mechanics in the absence of gravity). This expansion is a good one if the higher order terms in (x−x0) are smaller than the lower-order ones. In particular, we can approximate the potential by the quadratic term if
You might have been tempted to say “the third derivtive of V at x0 is smaller than the second derivative” but that makes no sense -- these quantities have different dimensions. In fact the viability of the approximation also depends on ∣x−x0∣ being small enough. This depends on the energy. We can see thius best classically: for larger energies, the particle has a larger range, and eventually the criterion (4) will break down.
This story is actually pretty general; for many problems, teh Lagrangian can be approximated at low energies by a Lagrangian which is quadratic in the phase space variables; if the system is stable, it can be reduced further to a collection of harmonic oscillators. This includes the electromagnetic field. Higher order or anharmonic terms (which in quantum field theory arises from particle interactions) can be treated in an approximation scheme known as perturbation theory.
Finally to get (1), we set V′(x0)=mω2. We can define ω this way (given m,V(x)). The reason for doing so becomes clear when we examine the solutions to the classical and quantum problems.
what we have learned is that the typical trange of variation of the wavefunction is set by ℏmω and the energy scales are set by ℏω.
We will solve this with a clever trick. We can write a=21(∂y+y) and a†=21(−∂y+y). The fact that this is the correct expression for teh Hermitian conjugate can be deduced using the standard norm on wavefunctions, or we can note that
We can use these facts to define the spectrum and generate solutions to the TISE. First, let us assume we have a normalized energy eigenstate ∣E⟩ with energy E. Then using (16) we find
If ∣ψ⟩ is an energy eigenstate with energy E, ⟨ψ∣H∣ψ⟩=E, so this means E must always be positive.
First, we will find the minimum energy solution ∣E0⟩. Since there are no states with lower energy, we must have a∣E0⟩=0. Since H=ℏω(a†a+21) this means that H∣E0⟩=21ℏω∣E0⟩, or E0=21ℏω. Excited states with energy E=ℏω(n+21) are proportional to (a†)n∣E0⟩. These are all of the states. The ground state and the states above are nondegenerate. If there were any states with energies different from ℏω(n+21), say with energy ℏω(n+21)+ϵ, with 0<ϵ<ℏω, we could act on them repeatedly with powers of a and lower the energy in units of ℏω. Sincse the starting point has the form ℏω(n+21)+ϵ, these other states will have energy ℏω(n−k+21)+ϵ. None of these will be equal to 21ℏω, so none can be annihilated by a and k can be arbitrarily large, and the energy arbitrarily negative. But we have proven the energy must be positive, so such states do not exist.
From here on out, we call the eigenstates ∣n⟩, n∈{0,1,2,…}, with energies En=ℏω(n+21). They are also eigenstates of a†a with eigenvalue n. We thus sometimes call a†a the number operator. One motivation is that when we quantize the electromagnetic field, it behaves as a collection of harmonic oscillators -- one for each polarization and wavenumber -- and n becomes the number of photons. We thus call a† a creation operator and a an annihilation operator.
Next we wish to construct the wavefunctions. We can write a∣0⟩=0 using the differential form of the operator as
When we apply n powers of a†=21(−∂y+y) to a Gaussian, we can see that the result is an nth order polynomial times the same Gaussian. These polynomials have a name -- they are the Hermite polynomials. The resulting wavefunctions are
where L=mωℏ, and Hn can be looked up in textbooks. One point of these functions is that they form a complete orthonormal basis of square-integrable functions, because they are eigenfunctions of a Hermitian operator.